Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw and refined sugar.

Summary

Full Text

Related Legislation

• H.R. 2642Farm bill

  2014-02-07Became Public Law No: 113-79.

  Related
• H.Res. 380Relating to consideration of the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 2642) to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2018, and for other purposes, providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 378) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to the Secretary of Agriculture's administration of tariff-rate quotas for raw and refined sugar, and providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 379) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding certain provisions of the Senate amendment to H.R. 2642 relating to crop insurance.

  2013-10-11Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  Related

Legislative Actions

1. 2013-10-11

   Introduced in House

2. 2013-10-11

   Introduced in House

3. 2013-10-11

   Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

4. 2013-10-11

   Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

5. 2013-10-11

   Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 380. (consideration: CR H6520-6527; text of measure as introduced: CR H6520)

6. 2013-10-11

   DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 378.

7. 2013-10-11

   The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H6520)

8. 2013-10-11

   POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.Res. 378, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Peterson demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing the resolution until a time to be announced.

9. 2013-10-12

   Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6556)

10. 2013-10-12