Amends the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 to prohibit U.S. courts from recognizing, enforcing, or otherwise validating any assertion of rights by an individual (currently, by a designated Cuban national) of a mark, trade name, or commercial name that was used in connection with a business or assets that were confiscated by the Cuban government unless the original owner of such mark or name, or such owner's bona fide successor, has expressly consented. Applies such prohibition only if the individual asserting the rights knew or had reason to know at the time of acquiring the rights asserted that the mark or name was the same or substantially similar to the mark or name used in connection with the business or assets that were confiscated.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 691 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 691
To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of
certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial
names.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
April 4, 2005
Mr. Domenici (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Santorum, Mr.
Ensign, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Allen, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr.
Bunning) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of
certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial
names.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION.
Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(b) of division A
of Public Law 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-88) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(2)--
(A) by striking ``by a designated national''; and
(B) by inserting before the period ``that was used
in connection with a business or assets that were
confiscated unless the original owner of the mark,
trade name, or commercial name, or the bonafide
successor-in-interest has expressly consented'';
(2) in subsection (b), by striking ``by a designated
national or its successor-in-interest'';
(3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
(4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
``(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall apply only
if the person or entity asserting the rights knew or had reason to know
at the time when the person or entity acquired the rights asserted that
the mark, trade name, or commercial name was the same as or
substantially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name that
was used in connection with a business or assets that were
confiscated.''; and
(5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``In
this section:'' and all that follows through ``(2) The term''
and inserting ``In this section, the term''.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3153)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3153)
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line