Disapproves the President's: (1) failure to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed," as required by the Constitution, and (2) usurpation of the legislative power of Congress through the rewriting of key provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Reaffirms that the preservation of the Constitution's separation of powers is essential for the protection of individual liberty and the maintenance of the rule of law.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 425 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 425
Expressing disapproval of the failure to satisfy the constitutional
duty to ``take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed'' and the
usurpation of the legislative authority of Congress by the President of
the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
November 20, 2013
Mr. DeSantis (for himself, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mrs.
Blackburn, Mr. Mulvaney, Mr. Garrett, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Fleming, Mr.
King of Iowa, Mr. Stutzman, Mr. Bridenstine, Mr. Yoho, Mr. McClintock,
and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) submitted the following resolution;
which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing disapproval of the failure to satisfy the constitutional
duty to ``take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed'' and the
usurpation of the legislative authority of Congress by the President of
the United States.
Whereas Article I of the United States Constitution vests Congress with all
legislative powers;
Whereas Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution imposes a duty
on the President to ``take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed'';
Whereas the Constitution does not delegate authority to the President to
rewrite, amend, or delay duly-enacted, constitutional laws;
Whereas the ``take care'' duty has roots in Anglo-American law dating back to
the Glorious Revolution of 17th century Britain, to wit, the English
Bill of Rights of 1689 provided that ``the pretended power of suspending
laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without the consent
of parliament, is illegal'';
Whereas President George Washington explained the Constitution's Take Care
Clause as follows: ``It is my duty to see the Laws executed: to permit
them to be trampled with impunity would be repugnant to'' that duty;
Whereas Thomas Jefferson observed that ``if the equilibrium of the three great
bodies, Legislative, Executive and Judiciary, could be preserved, if the
Legislature could be kept independent,'' he would ``never fear the
result of such a government'', but that ``he could not but be uneasy
when I saw that the Executive had swallowed up the Legislative branch'';
Whereas Alexander Hamilton explained in The Federalist No. 69 that, under the
Constitution, the President ``can prescribe no rules concerning the
commerce or currency of the nation'';
Whereas James Madison wrote in The Federalist No. 47 that the ``accumulation of
all powers, legislative, executive and judiciary, in the same hands,
whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed,
or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny'';
Whereas the text of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requires that
the Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health Coverage
provision, commonly known as the employer mandate, ``shall apply to
months beginning after December 31, 2013'';
Whereas, on July 2, 2013, the executive branch announced that the President
unilaterally rewrote the employer mandate provision to apply to the
months applying after December 31, 2014;
Whereas, on July 17, 2013, the House of Representatives passed a bill to delay
the employer mandate by statute;
Whereas the President threatened to veto the lawful change proposed by the House
even though it was precisely the statutory change he instituted by
executive fiat;
Whereas the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act renders insurance
policies that fail to contain what the government defines as ``essential
minimum benefits'' to be illegal;
Whereas millions of Americans are losing their individual health insurance
policies because such policies do not qualify for grandfather status
under the statute;
Whereas, on November 14, 2013, the President announced that he would ``extend''
the statute's grandfather clause to include plans not protected under
the statute;
Whereas, on November 15, 2013, the House of Representatives passed a bill to
overrule the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act that are causing mass cancellations of insurance policies; and
Whereas, on November 15, 2013, the President threatened to veto the lawful
statutory change proposed by the House of Representatives: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) disapproves of the President's failure to ``take Care
that the Laws be faithfully executed'' as required by the
Constitution;
(2) disapproves of the President's usurpation of the
legislative power of Congress through the rewriting of key
provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act;
and
(3) reaffirms that the preservation of the Constitution's
separation of powers is essential for the protection of
individual liberty and the maintenance of the rule of law.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H7338-7339)
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line