Farm Dust Regulation Prevention Act of 2011 - Prohibits the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from proposing, finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any regulation revising the national primary ambient air quality standard or the national secondary ambient air quality standard applicable to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter greater than 2.5 micrometers under the Clean Air Act (CAA) for one year.
Exempts nuisance dust from the CAA and excludes nuisance dust from references in such Act to particulate matter, except with respect to geographic areas where such dust is not regulated under state, tribal, or local law if the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, finds that: (1) nuisance dust (or any subcategory of nuisance dust) causes substantial adverse public health and welfare effects at ambient concentrations; and (2) the benefits of applying CAA standards and other requirements to such dust outweigh the costs.
Defines "nuisance dust" as particulate matter that: (1) is generated primarily from natural sources, unpaved roads, agricultural activities, earth moving, or other activities typically conducted in rural areas; (2) consists primarily of soil, other natural or biological materials, windblown dust, or some combination thereof; (3) is not emitted directly into the ambient air from combustion, such as exhaust from combustion engines and emissions from stationary combustion processes; (4) is not comprised of residuals from the combustion of coal; and (5) does not include radioactive particulate matter produced from uranium mining or processing.
Expresses the sense of Congress that the Administrator should implement an approach to excluding exceptional events, or events that are not reasonably controllable or preventable, from determinations of whether an area is in compliance with any national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) applicable to coarse particulate matter that maximizes transparency and predictability for states, tribes, and local governments and minimizes their regulatory and cost burdens.
Requires the Administrator, before taking a covered action, to analyze its impact, disaggregated by state, on employment levels in the agriculture industry and on agricultural economic activity, utilizing the best available economic models. Defines a "covered action" as an action by the Administrator under the Clean Air Act, relating to agriculture and the primary and secondary NAAQS for particulate matter, to: (1) issue a regulation, policy statement, guidance, response to a petition, or other requirement; or (2) implement a new or substantially altered program. Requires the Administrator to: (1) post such analysis on the main page of EPA's website; (2) request the Secretary of Agriculture to post it on the main page of the Department of Agriculture's website; and (3) request the governor of any state experiencing more than a de minimis negative impact to post such analysis in the state's capitol.
Requires the Administrator to: (1) hold a public hearing in each state in which a covered action will have more than a de minimis negative impact on agricultural employment levels or agricultural economic activity, at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the action; and (2) give notice of such impact to the state's congressional delegation, governor, and legislature at least 45 days before the effective date of the action. Defines "de minimis negative impact" as: (1) a loss of more than 100 jobs related to the agriculture industry, or (2) a decrease in agricultural economic activity of more than $1 million over any calendar year.
[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1633 Introduced in House (IH)]
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1633
To establish a temporary prohibition against revising any national
ambient air quality standard applicable to coarse particulate matter,
to limit Federal regulation of nuisance dust in areas in which such
dust is regulated under State, tribal, or local law, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 15, 2011
Mrs. Noem (for herself, Mr. Hurt, Mr. Boswell, and Mr. Kissell)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Energy and Commerce
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To establish a temporary prohibition against revising any national
ambient air quality standard applicable to coarse particulate matter,
to limit Federal regulation of nuisance dust in areas in which such
dust is regulated under State, tribal, or local law, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Farm Dust Regulation Prevention Act
of 2011''.
SEC. 2. TEMPORARY PROHIBITION AGAINST REVISING ANY NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR
QUALITY STANDARD APPLICABLE TO COARSE PARTICULATE MATTER.
Before the date that is one year after the date of the enactment of
this Act, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency may
not propose, finalize, implement, or enforce any regulation revising
the national primary ambient air quality standard or the national
secondary ambient air quality standard applicable to particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter greater than 2.5 micrometers under section
109 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7409).
SEC. 3. NUISANCE DUST.
Part A of title I of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``SEC. 132. REGULATION OF NUISANCE DUST PRIMARILY BY STATE, TRIBAL, AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
``(a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act
does not apply to, and references in this Act to particulate matter are
deemed to exclude, nuisance dust.
``(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to any
geographic area in which nuisance dust is not regulated under State,
tribal, or local law insofar as the Administrator finds that--
``(1) nuisance dust (or any subcategory of nuisance dust)
causes substantial adverse public health and welfare effects at
ambient concentrations; and
``(2) the benefits of applying standards and other
requirements of this Act to nuisance dust (or such subcategory
of nuisance dust) outweigh the costs (including local and
regional economic and employment impacts) of applying such
standards and other requirements to nuisance dust (or such
subcategory).
``(c) Definition.--In this section, the term `nuisance dust' means
particulate matter--
``(1) generated from natural sources, unpaved roads,
agricultural activities, earth moving, or other activities
typically conducted in rural areas; or
``(2) consisting primarily of soil, other natural or
biological materials, windblown dust, or some combination
thereof.''.
<all>
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Markey amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Markey demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Waxman amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Waxman amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Whitfield demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Schock amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Al Green (TX) amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Al Green (TX) amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Green demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was on adoption of amendments which were debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1633.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H8294)
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H8282-8283)
Ms. DeGette moved to recommit with instructions to Energy and Commerce. (consideration: CR H8294-8296; text: CR H8294)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the DeGette motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment that adds a new section to the bill to prohibit any part of the bill from limiting the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from proposing, finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any regulation promulgated under the Clean Air Act relating to specified emissions.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H8295)
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 166 - 252 (Roll no. 911).
Roll Call #911 (House)Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 268 - 150 (Roll no. 912).
Roll Call #912 (House)On passage Passed by recorded vote: 268 - 150 (Roll no. 912).
Roll Call #912 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 256.