(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
FHA Multifamily Loan Limit Adjustment Act of 2006 - Amends the National Housing Act to increase high-cost area and project-based additional mortgage loan limits for Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured mortgages for: (1) rental housing; (2) cooperative housing; (3) rehabilitation and neighborhood conservation housing insurance; (4) moderate income and displaced family housing; (5) housing for the elderly; and (6) condominiums.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5503 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5503
To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount
limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing
located in high-cost areas.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 25, 2006
Mr. Gary G. Miller of California (for himself and Mr. Frank of
Massachusetts) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Financial Services
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the National Housing Act to increase the mortgage amount
limits applicable to FHA mortgage insurance for multifamily housing
located in high-cost areas.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``FHA Multifamily Loan Limit
Adjustment Act of 2006''.
SEC. 2. MULTIFAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE LIMITS IN HIGH COST AREAS.
The National Housing Act is amended--
(1) in sections 207(c)(3), 213(b)(2)(B)(i),
221(d)(3)(ii)(II), 221(d)(4)(ii)(II), 231(c)(2)(B), and
234(e)(3)(B) (12 U.S.C. 1713(c)(3), 1715e(b)(2)(B)(i),
1715l(d)(3)(ii)(II), 1715l(d)(4)(ii)(II), 1715v(c)(2)(B) and
1715y(e)(3)(B))--
(A) by striking ``140 percent'' each place such
term appears and inserting `` 170 percent''; and
(B) by striking ``170 percent in high cost areas''
each time place such term appears and inserting ``215
percent in high cost areas''; and
(2) in section 220(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III) (12 U.S.C.
1715k(d)(3)(B)(iii)(III)) by striking ``206A'' and all that
follows through ``project-by-project basis'' and inserting the
following: ``206A of this Act) by not to exceed 170 percent in
any geographical area where the Secretary finds that cost
levels so require and by not to exceed 170 percent, or 215
percent in high cost areas, where the Secretary determines it
necessary on a project-by-project basis''.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 109-645.
Reported by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 109-645.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 384.
Mr. Miller, Gary moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7594-7596)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5503.
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7594)
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7594)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.