[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2625 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
106th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2625
To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the performance
standards and certification process for organ procurement
organizations.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 24, 2000
Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Wellstone, Mr.
Torricelli, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Moynihan)
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the performance
standards and certification process for organ procurement
organizations.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ORGAN PROCUREMENT ORGANIZATION CERTIFICATION ACT OF 2000.
(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Organ procurement organizations play an important role
in the effort to increase organ donation in the United States.
(2) The current process for the certification and
recertification of organ procurement organizations conducted by
the Department of Health and Human Services has created a level
of uncertainty that is interfering with the effectiveness of
organ procurement organizations in raising the level of organ
donation.
(3) The General Accounting Office, the Institute of
Medicine, and the Harvard School of Public Health have
identified substantial limitations in the organ procurement
organization certification and recertification process and have
recommended changes in that process.
(4) The limitations in the recertification process include:
(A) An exclusive reliance on population-based
measures of performance that do not account for the
potential in the population for organ donation and do
not permit consideration of other outcome and process
standards that would more accurately reflect the
relative capability and performance of each organ
procurement organization.
(B) A lack of due process to appeal to the
Secretary of Health and Human Services for
recertification on either substantive or procedural
grounds.
(5) The Secretary of Health and Human Services has the
authority under section 1138(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-8(b)(1)(A)(i)) to extend the period for
recertification of an organ procurement organization from 2 to
4 years on the basis of its past practices in order to avoid
the inappropriate disruption of the nation's organ system.
(6) The Secretary of Health and Human Services can use the
extended period described in paragraph (5) for recertification
of all organ procurement organizations to--
(A) develop improved performance measures that
would reflect organ donor potential and interim
outcomes, and to test these measures to ensure that
they accurately measure performance differences among
the organ procurement organizations; and
(B) improve the overall certification process by
incorporating process as well as outcome performance
measures, and developing equitable processes for
appeals.
(b) Certification and Recertification of Organ Procurement
Organizations.--Section 371(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 273(b)(1)) is amended--
(1) by redesignating subparagraphs (D) through (G) as
subparagraphs (E) through (H), respectively;
(2) by realigning the margin of subparagraph (F) (as so
redesignated) so as to align with subparagraph (E) (as so
redesignated); and
(3) by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following:
``(D) notwithstanding any other provision of law, has met
the other requirements of this section and has been certified
or recertified by the Secretary within the previous 4-year
period as meeting the performance standards to be a qualified
organ procurement organization through a process that either--
``(i) granted certification or recertification
within such 4-year period with such certification or
recertification in effect as of January 1, 2000, and
remaining in effect through the earlier of--
``(I) January 1, 2002; or
``(II) the completion of recertification
under the requirements of clause (ii); or
``(ii) is defined through regulations that are
promulgated by the Secretary by not later than January
1, 2002, that--
``(I) require recertifications of qualified
organ procurement organizations not more
frequently than once every 4 years;
``(II) rely on outcome and process
performance measures that are based on
empirical evidence, obtained through reasonable
efforts, of organ donor potential and other
related factors in each service area of
qualified organ procurement organizations;
``(III) use multiple outcome measures as
part of the certification process; and
``(IV) provide for a qualified organ
procurement organization to appeal a
decertification to the Secretary on substantive
and procedural grounds;''.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S4389-4390)
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S4718-4719; text: CR S4718-4719)
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4718-4719; text: CR S4718-4719)
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the House.
Referred to the House Committee on Commerce.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line