Prohibits the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most favored nation status) to the products of a country which is a signatory to the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (Helsinki Final Act) and whose products were not receiving such nondiscriminatory treatment as of January 1, 1989, unless the President certifies to the Congress that such country is either in complete or substantially complete compliance with such Final Act, particularly the human rights and humanitarian affairs provisions.
24758 W.E.D. 1/7/89 HR 398 IH 101st CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 398 To enforce the Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe by denying most favored nation status to countries which are not in complete or substantially complete compliance with the Helsinki Final Act. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 1988 Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means and Foreign Affairs A BILL To enforce the Helsinki Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe by denying most favored nation status to countries which are not in complete or substantially complete compliance with the Helsinki Final Act. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. ENFORCEMENT OF THE HELSINKI FINAL ACT. A country-- (1) which is a signatory to the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (also known as the `Helsinki Final Act'), and (2) whose products were not receiving as of January 1, 1989, nondiscriminatory treatment under the tariff laws of the United States (also known as `most favored nation status' or `MFN status'), shall not have such nondiscriminatory treatment extended to its products unless the President first certifies in writing to the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and to the Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives that such signatory country is in complete compliance or in substantially complete compliance with such Final Act, particularly the human rights and humanitarian affairs provisions. SEC. 2. SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE COMPLIANCE DEFINED. For the purposes of section 1, the term `substantially complete compliance' means-- (1) a pattern of compliance with the requirements of the Helsinki Final Act in a manner comparable to that displayed by democratic signatory countries, with any violations clearly the rare and exceptional act of local authorities contrary to established policy and generally observed practice in such country; (2) the existence, in theory and in practice, of legal procedures and presumptions, statutes, administrative regulations, limitations on law enforcement authorities, and judicial means of redress that facilitate and encourage, rather than frustrate, the exercise of basic rights as specified in the Helsinki Final Act by the citizens and inhabitants of such country; and (3) the ability of citizens of such country and citizens of other signatory countries, in theory and in practice, freely to monitor the performance of the governmental authorities of such country with regard to the requirements of the Helsinki Final Act throughout the territory of such country, and to publicize their findings, both in such country and abroad.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Referred to the Subcommittee on International Economic Policy and Trade.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations.
Executive Comment Requested from State.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line